tisdag 28 oktober 2014

What is good and bad in The Unaligned?


We bet you wonder what the Stockholmjyhad bloggers think of The Unaligned, the new official set from VEKN, allowed for tournament play 4 November. Below we grade the minion cards on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is Tortured Confession or Mummy´s Tounge or something like that, and 5 is Govern the Unaligned or Villein or something like that.

Note: This is our views a couple of weeks after the release. We will try to do a follow up on this in a year or so - it will be very interesting to see how our views have changed then!






















Bear's Skin
Ashur: 2 “Fun, but I don´t really see a need for this.”
Tomas: 2
Myrdin: 2
Randyman: 3 “Nice but not broken. Surprisingly strong at inferior.”

Blight
Ashur: 2
Tomas: 2
Myrdin: 2
Randyman: 1 “Wallpaper IMHO.”

Dam the Heart's River
Ashur: 2
Tomas: 2
Myrdin: 2
Randyman: 2 “An ok card, but not what the assamites need.”

Ennoia's Theater
Ashur: 4
Tomas: 3
Myrdin: 3
Randyman: 4 “Good, well-balanced. A barrens with a bonus.”

Focus the Blood                         
Ashur: 3 “Notice that it stays on the vamp if not used = way superior to Inner Essence.”
Tomas: 3
Myrdin: 3
Randyman: 3 “A nice card, but hard to find card slots for.”

Funeral Wake
Ashur: 2 “Sure, nice to both rush and block with Shamblings, but I think it´s hard to find card slots in that type of deck.”
Tomas: 4 or 5
Myrdin: 4
Randyman: 3 “Totally ok and well-balanced.”

Gianna di Canneto
Ashur: 4 “Just compare stats and cost to Felix Fix Hessian! And it´s ability is very useful for removing that annoying equipment. The other ability is just plain better than Neighborhood Watch Commander.”
Tomas: 4
Myrdin: 4
Randyman: 3 “Strong!”

Gift of Proteus
Ashur: 1 “Ain´t nobody got time for that!
Tomas: 3
Myrdin: 2 ”Protean decks seldom has the need to discard stealth or combat cards.”
Randyman: 3 “Ok, but hard to fit into a deck.”

Giulia Giovanni Abruzzina
Ashur: 3
Tomas: 3
Myrdin: 3
Randyman: 3 “Strong.”

Hall of Mirrors
Ashur: 3 “Manuever is great, and you can both use it to avoid dangerous strikes and cancelling s:ce. This card is better than Deathseeker.”
Tomas: 3
Myrdin: 3
Randyman: 2 “Weird card. We´ll see if this makes ravnos combat decks more popular.”

Illusory Resources
Ashur: 2 “Ain´t nobody got time for that! Maybe had been better as a master, although master slots are scarce.”
Tomas: 2
Myrdin: 2
Randyman: 2 “A bit good-bad. A nice way to make sure you don´t lose the Edge in a heads up.”

In Memory of the Two Lands
Ashur: 2 ”Master slots are scarce. Would have been more interesting if the set would have had a playable non-unique mummy ally, but that didn´t happen.”
Tomas: 2
Myrdin: 4
Randyman: 2 ”I don´t see how any mummy decks will turn up in the meta.”

Nar-Sheptha
Ashur: 3
Tomas: 3
Myrdin: 3
Randyman: 2 “This is somewhat what the assamites need – enhanced card flow and forcing opposed minion to be acting saves you blood and cards.”

Ophidian Gaze
Ashur: 2
Tomas: 2
Myrdin: 2 ”Bleed reduce is always worst than bleed bounce.”
Randyman: 3 “
A rather well-balanced card.”

Priority Contract
Ashur: 3 “The trifleness makes this playable, but it being usable only forward is a BIG drawback.”
Tomas: 3
Myrdin: 3
Randyman: 4 “Nice because it forces you to go forward.”

Rewilding
Ashur: 1 “The card sucks. As do Arson and Rampage. Cards like this needs more effects to be playable. Haunt is ok (if you have locations to protect), as is Conceal.”
Tomas: 3
Myrdin: 3
Randyman: 1 ”I can´t see myself using this, not even as toilet paper.”

Saatet-ta
Ashur: 4
Tomas: 4
Myrdin: 4
Randyman: 3 “Strong ally that will see play.”

Sanguine Entrapment
Ashur: 3 “Like Immortal Grapple some time, this card makes all Assmates prerange stuff playble, maybe even Thin Blood.”
Tomas: 3
Myrdin: 4
Randyman: 3 “More combat, which isn´t needed.”

Serpent's Numbing Kiss
Ashur: 3
Tomas: 4
Myrdin: 3
Randyman: 4 “Funny card. Nice at inferior becaused it´s free.”

Skaald
Ashur: 3 “Ain´t nobody got time for that!”
Tomas: 3
Myrdin: 4
Randyman: 1 “A weak card, because it´s only good when you are voting.”

Spiritual Guidance
Ashur: 2 “The problem is it sucks in the early part of the game, and I don´t think it´s good later either. Maybe with Liquidation.”
Tomas: 4
Myrdin: 2
Randyman: 3 “An ok complement, but it presupposes Giovanni combat, which is subpar.”

Suspension of Disbelief
Ashur: 2 “I guess that if you play a Ravnos bleed deck, without dominate and with no intention to rush/tap minions (with Deep Song), this is good.”
Tomas: 3
Myrdin: 2 ”This doesn´t bleed hard enough for anyone to need to bounce it. It´s not a Govern.”
Randyman: 2 “Just slightly better than Computer hacking. It need´s an action modifier to motivate a bounce in the first place.”

Thing
Ashur: 4 ”I can´t really see this card becoming such a boring combo-nuisance as Reunion Kamut, as Gangrel don´t have cards equivalent to Recruitment Exercise and Watchtower: Wolves Feed. It´s rather like a nice crypt acceleration-THING that gives an incentive to mix smallcaps and bigcaps in the same deck.”
Tomas: 4
Myrdin: 3
Randyman: 3 ”An ok card that will see some play, but not much.”

Velvet Tongue
Ashur: 2
Tomas: 3
Myrdin: 4
Randyman: 4 “One of my favourites in the set. It might have tough competing with Bewitching Oration, but I think I will try it to some tricky deck.”

Zephyr
Ashur: 3 “Act. Get blocked. Zephyr at inferior. Majesty. Act. Untap at end of turn = Fun. Although I don´t like playing cards that presupposes failure.”
Tomas: 3
Myrdin: 3 ”It´s like a Change of Target.”
Randyman: 4 “A good card that will see play. I like that it has an built-in motivation to play a lot of them as you have to fail your action to play it.”






















So, according to the Stockholmjyhad jury, the best cards in The Unaligned are:
Saatet-ta: 15 of 20
Ennoia's Theater: 14 of 20
Serpent's Numbing Kiss: 14 of 20
Thing: 14 of 20






















The worst cards are:
Blight: 7 of 20
Rewilding: 8 of 20
Illusory Resources: 8 of 20
Gift of Proteus: 8 of 20
Dam the Heart's River: 8 of 20
 
Myrdin: “I think more cards of this set will see play compared to Danse Macabre. The vampires are more measured when it comes to what other vampires they can be combined with. More of the the minion cards gives opportunity to new decks. Good work design team!”

Randyman: “Yes, it is clear that the design team now have more ‘kött på benen’ and has evolved in their work.”

Ashur: ”I would like to give extra credit to Damnans (Ginés) and the other artists. I think the artwork is very important, and I feel it´s on the same level as White Wolfs sets, if not better.”

The pdfs of all cards can be downloaded for free at vekn.net.

måndag 27 oktober 2014

The Stockholm League - October 22 2014


Randyman rocks with The Unaligned tech.






















Two tables was played in the ninth round of ten in our August-October league.

Standard tournament rules apply + printed proxy is allowed AND cards from the new set The Unaligned are allowed.

Table 1:
1. Kalle (Giovanni sb)
2. Rasmus (Malkavian ´94 sb) 1 vp
3. Henrik (Baali Malefecia sb)
4. Tomas (Giovanni Khazar´s Diary)
5. Randy (Setites Kementiri + Sarrasine Velvet Tounge vote) 4 vp, 1 gw

Table 2:
1. Ober (Gangrel breed-boon) 2 vp
2. Henrik (Nosferatu Cock Robin toolbox) 3 vp, 1 gw
3. Tomas (True Brujah sb)
4. Kim (Gangrel Stanislava vote)
5. Kalle (!Nosferatu Beast rush)

League standings:
Jonas H 78 rtp
Jens 70 rtp
Randy 68 rtp
David 60 rtp
Henrik 54 rtp
Ober 44 rtp
Martin 40 rtp
Rasmus 34 rtp
Erik M 28 rtp
Robert 20 rtp
Kim 16 rtp
Peter, Tomas 8 rtp
Jan Erik 6 rtp
Caroline, Ivan, Johan, Kalle, Rudolf 4 rtp
(1 gw = 8 ratingpoints, 1 vp = 4 ratingpoints. Note: Players can play more than one game each round if their participation are needed to complete a table where at least one player has not yet played a league game this round, but only the best result each round counts for rating. If more players than 5 want to play such a table, lowest vp-count this round has priority. No league game starts after 20.00.)

The next round of the league is played at Dragon´s Lair, Kungsholmstorg 8 next Wednesday about 1800-ish. Be there!

lördag 25 oktober 2014

Ashur´s EC experience 2014 part 3: EC day 2

Hi again. I write this several weeks after playing, so sorry if I can´t recall all details correctly.

After playing Randymans dirty Titus-deck to qualify from day 1, I was were uncertain what to pick for day 2. The overall rumour about day 2 is that it´s a very defensive, grindy environment, with many passive decks trying to stay alive and many tables timing. So my original plan was a Malefecia steath-bleed “wall cracker”, also designed by Randy, but as I hadn´t had time to test it at all, so I didn´t dare.






















But I chose another deck I hadn´t tried. I borrowed a !Tremere Blood Fury “stickmen slayer” combat toolbox from my friend Robert – thanks Robert! It stars Uta Kovacs and builds around her rushing with lot´s of Blood Fury, Apportation and Taste of Vitae (yes, Taste, not Theft). It also has decent defense Abbots, Rego Motus and lot´s of bleed bounce. I don´t want to spoil the decklist until it has won some tournament :)

The deck is more in line with various Carna- and Oliver Thrace-decks I´ve played with some success the latest year, so I felt more comfortable with this choice compared to some Baali glass cannon.



Table 1



















Difficulty for me: 2/5. This didn´t seem at all impossible. Lot´s of soft targets, and I play lots of bounce to save me from The Unnamed, who wasn´t bleeding very hard, just damn consistently! I few wellplaced rushes and lot´s of those bounces, this could be a game win. But …
My performance: 1/5. I play 5 copies of Uta, as I need her rush to get good card flow … but … I didn´t draw her on my first 4 vampires. That is about 7-8 % risk or something like that, fine, shit happens. But I didn´t find her on my fifth draw either. Or on my sixth!! I got out a vamp or two with Abbot and Heart of Nizchetus, but without Uta I couldn´t survive in the long run, and absolutely not do anything creative forward.
The other players: Michael and Caroline are both swedes, I´ve played with them a thousand times. Michael had no chance against Pablos breeding Ventrue Directorate Assembly-onslaught, and Pablo got very high on pool. But after that oust the game slowed down for a while, as the Assembly was burned every time it came out. With about 20-30 minutes left or so Romain but in a new gear with 3 fast Shatter the Gate by Enkil Cog-delivery, and the table began to crumble. But Pablo was still at about 25 pool, so I thought he would win. As I myself died to the Gates, Caroline played some good Parity Shifts and some Ancilla Empowerments/Anarchist Uprisings with Voter Captivations. There was some controversies about stalling in the end, but judge Johannes Walch made some good calls adding time to punish the staller, so Caroline could oust and the table timed out.
Lesson to learn: If you really need you´re star vampire, play 6 copies. AND keep you´re fingers crossed!

Caroline: 1,5 vp
Pablo: 1 vp
Romain: 1,5 vp


Table 1 from my point of view, before any ousting.




















Table 2


Difficulty for me:
3/5. I get my favourite prey, Ventrue stickmen, but I don´t like my predator, evil evil Lambach & co. But I play rather many Rego Motus, so I might be able to handle their agg-strikes to some extent.  
My performance: 2/5. I totally smash Erols minions – he had three vamps with 0 blood at one time – but get pretty violated by Arnaud, with Pentex and Eagles Sights and so on. Failure again.
The other players: Erol always plays very smart, beating my anti-stickmen at one time with Lodin+stick+press+press (and thereby stoping me when Arnaud could block my hunts), and although he was hurt he could Govern down and get 4-5 minions.
     Erik, a Stockholm regular like me, plays a very cool and low profile deck, a !Gangrel toolbox which is all about equipping and untapping and having both 3 intercept and 3 stealth – I have no idea how it works. He keeps Arnaud under solid pressure, but the frenchman play a wall, so he has no problem blocking both predator and prey.
     Noora gets rather close to ousting Erik a couple of times, but time is not on her side.
     I get ousted by Arnaud when my combat fizzles.
     With just a few minutes left of the game, Erol launches and ousts Noora … almost. Arnaud, now at 1,5 vps, playes Life Boon and snatches 0,5 vp – a game win!
Lesson to learn: The deck works against stickmen.

The cards of Noora, Erik and Arnaud. Erol was also still in the game,
but I a very bad photographer :)




















Table 3




















Difficulty for me:
3/5. Hard to say, but my combat will beat both ani-weenie and Miller with a bit of luck. Randys combat is of course very dangerous, but with my manouevers for defense and by timing some good hitback, I should at lease have a chance. And I had.
My performance: 4/5. I did ok, collecting the scraps – my usual tactics in this game.
The other players: Otso was out pretty early, backousted, I only think he took one or two actions.
     The ani-weenie player had some incredibly bad table talk, possibly the most aggressive I´ve ever encountered. He was threatening both his crosstable allies without any reason – my response is as always “I don´t respond well to threats”. He then tried some random, childish kingmaking when he know he was on his way out. He also accused me of “not understanding the game”, something I took as “You are stupid”. Then I ousted him.
     Mr Miller dude I think played a bit to passive, if he would have hurt me a bit more early he would have ousted me before I could oust Otso and Mr Superaggressive dude, and thereby possibly taking those two easy vp´s himself.
     My dear friend Randy is as always very nice to play with, helping his allies and all that … and he is always dangerous. He always plays the most powerful decks at tournaments like this, and he knows his deck very well. I was very careful and a bit lucky in the heads up.
Lesson to learn: Adapt to the game, but never get stressed. Know your deck and it´s strenghts and weaknesses.

Randyman: 1,5 vp
Me: 1 gw 2,5 vp

Conclusion: I think I picked the exact right deck, and with just a little bit more skill and luck, it could have been total success. Now my single game win just made me number 11 of 40, but it´s my best result ever at an EC, so I was real happy afterwards. The positive energy it gave now make me go on arranging our league and tournaments, playtesting and caring about V:tes. Good times!

Erol, Arnaud, Martin, Ruben and Nicola in the EC 2014 final.

















The EC was won by Arnaud Baigts, the french player who took the gw in my game 2 by playing Life Boon. Looking at his card list I don´t really understand how he could do so good, the deck is not exactly fancy. It must be pure skill, and that I respect. Congrats Arnaud!

I hope to see you all in Warsaw next year. Rumour has it we might have this game in print again by then - I sincerely hope so!

måndag 20 oktober 2014

Ashur´s EC experience 2014 part 2: EC day 1

Hi. After bombing pretty hard in the LCQ (just 1,5 vp) I felt really motivated to do better in EC day 1. Tired of making Parity Shift-deals with my Tremere vote deck, I decided that my best chance to get at least one game win was to play a real simple deck.

I chose Randal Rudstams TWD “Jag vill ha en bleedlek med mycket stealth” starring Titus Camille. It´s basically a Malk ´94 stealth-bleeder fitted with a group 3-4 crypt, with the extra twist of Titus on top, stealing Heart of Nizchetus, Bowl of Convergence and such nasty stuff.

I don´t think I tweaked it at all myself. Possibly I switched one or two action modifiers, I can´t remember.





















“I want a bleed deck with lots of stealth”
Crypt (12 cards)
1x  Assad Salhoum           5  aus dem dom obf          Malkavian:4
1x  Black Lotus             5  aus obf ser DOM          Follower of Set:4
1x  Dr. Douglas Netchurch   6  dem dom AUS OBF          Malkavian:3
1x  Halim Bey               6  obf tha DOM SER          Follower of Set:4
1x  Louis de Maisonneuve    5  aus dom obf FOR          !Ventrue:4
1x  Phillipe Rigaud         7  ani aus obt DOM OBF PRO  !Gangrel:4
1x  Preston Varrick         7  aus nec DOM OBF THA      Tremere:4
5x  Titus Camille           8  for AUS DOM OBF          !Ventrue:4

Library (79 cards)
Master (13)
1x Anarch Troublemaker
1x Coven, The
3x Dreams of the Sphinx
1x Fragment of the Book of Nod
1x Giant's Blood
2x Life in the City
1x Misdirection
3x Wash

Action (17)
10x Govern the Unaligned
3x Revelations
4x Scouting Mission

Action Modifier (28)
2x Bonding
1x Cloak the Gathering
6x Conditioning
2x Elder Impersonation
3x Faceless Night
1x Foreshadowing Destruction
4x Freak Drive
5x Lost in Crowds
2x Seduction
2x Spying Mission

Reaction (14)
6x Deflection
3x Delaying Tactics
4x On the Qui Vive
1x Redirection

Combat (4)
4x No Trace

Combo (3)
3x Swallowed by the Night


Table 1


















Difficulty for me: 2/5. Michals deck is kind of a wall, but I was lucky getting Pentex Subversion on Gotsdam (you know, The Tired Warrior), and Neighbor John couldn´t defend on his own.
My performance: 4/5. Very good.
The other players: No real mistakes as I recall.
Lesson to learn: Fragment of the Book of Nod is a really underrated card, although I saw Ben Peal playing two copies in his awesome, sleeveless all-Jyhad Malk ´94 LCQ-finalist deck. It won me this game, as I could unload reactions from my hand in the beginning of each turn – of course especially useful heads up with Janne.

Me: 4 vp



Table 2


















Difficulty for me: 3/5. The seating itself was not very complicated if only looking at my prey and predator, but I wasn´t sure how to pace things considering the other two decks. I also had a strange draw (see below).
My performance: 2/5. Made some stupid decisions here, based on my initial draw. I had 3 bounces on my starting hand, and instead of discarding them and trying to fish for Governs to get free vamps, I decided to keep them and wait for a launch from Eliseu (who of course got his Governs to get free vamps). But Eliseu is a somewhat good player, so he didn´t launch, not even when he had four vamps out.
The other players: As mentioned, Eliseu played this one real slow, using his Powerbase Savannah to handle most of Emilianos Nephandi pressure. Helmuth played outright wrong as he decided to stubbornly defend his Madness Network against the Nephandi, and was easly ousted by Noora.
     This left us with a funny 4-player situation where Noora had a Gabrielle di Righetti with Helicopter, eating one Nephandi each turn and still being able to do other useful stuff. Eliseu eventually ousted me, partly with a surprise Reckless Agitation (he didn´t have any titled vamps himself, so Noora helped him. I guess she was more comfortable with Eliseus DOM-vamps then with my DOM-vamps).Lesson to learn: Never slowplay a deck like this. The right decision would have been to discard all reactions and go full speed forward.
     Also: There was MUCH talking going on at this table. Almost every card, every action was commented, discussed and even sung a little song about. I don´t understand this really – I guess it´s either because some players feel they don´t need the full two hours to win, or it´s to somehow confuse less experienced players to make mistakes. Either way it takes a lot of time and makes it hard to end games within time limit.

I´m not sure how this ended, but I think it timed with
Eliseu: 1,5 vp
Noora: 1,5 vp
Emiliano: 0,5 vp

Nooras cards, and Emilianos Nephandi in the top left corner.


















Eliseus cards, including the very nice Powerbase Savannah.



















Table 3



















Difficulty for me: 5/5. Mirror match with Kim (also a Stockholm player), and two decks able to rush at the table – not good. I talked with her about which vamps to influence, so that wasn´t the real problem.
My performance: 2/5. I couldn´t do much about this game, my deck doesn´t give me a lot of leverage for deals.
The other players: Kim put really hard pressure on Riccardo fast, and Andrés wanted to rush her vamps even before Riccardo was ousted. But then Kim and Andrés stroke a really weird deal – Kim was not to bleed Andrés before he had ousted Guiseppe. I guess Kim didn´t count on how hard it could be for a zombie deck to oust a wallish AND rushing Horrid Form-deck.
     Anyway – I was on the losing end of this whole arrangement. Andrés didn´t do much at all against Guiseppe the first hour, so he could rush and bleed me without worries. Kim bounced my bleeds directly into Guiseppe, so he could destroy my vamps without even rushing them. AND Andrés both took cards from me with Le Dinh Tho´s special and rushed me multiple times with his Ossian, stating he had to make him grow to survive combat with the Tzimisces (strange and futile). So I played against 3 players, not sure why really.
     Anyway, Kim broke the bad deal with Andrés when she noticed he couldn´t oust, and ousted us all. All table sweeps are good table sweeps? Congrats Kim!
Lesson to learn: This is what you get when you play a deck without votes or any other means of making good deals. Also, I guess my table talk could have been better, but I was so baffled by the Kim-Andrés deal I couldn´t think of something smart to say.
     Also, I learned Phillipe Rigaud´s worst drawback the hard way, as he OF COURSE diablerized my own Titus Camille, burning them both.

Kim: 5 vp

Table 3 after about 1 hour (I guess). Yes, that is a pink gorilla edge.

















Conclusion: 1 gw, 4 vp took took me to EC day 2, so mission accomplished!
     The deck runs pretty smooth – it´s a shameless stealth-bleeder, not much fun but does it´s thing.
    I´ll might try replacing Phillipe Rigaud though, his drawback is super heavy. I guess Catherine du Bois should be there, but I´m not sure how that messes with the Govern-stairway.
    Then there´s the 5 Titus-problem. It might be fixed with a couple of Wider View, but I don´t like such a passive card in a deck like this.

Two fellow Stockholm players, Kim and Ivan, was in the final of this tournament, but like the LCQ it was won by Ruben Feldman, playing old school Nosferatu royalty. He was first seed, doing a unbelievable 3 gw 13 vp in the preliminaries. I have no idea how to pull that off with such a deck, I must try to build and play it.

Finalists Ivan (Myrdin), Ruben, Kim, Otso and Patrick.

















Stay tuned for the day 2 report!

söndag 19 oktober 2014

The Stockholm League - October 15 2014

Wicked card. Helped Henrik secure table 2.






















Five tables was played in the eigth round of ten in our August-October league.

Standard tournament rules apply + printed proxy is allowed AND cards from the new set The Unaligned are allowed.

Table 1:
1. Kim (Inner Circle ???) 1 vp
2. Kalle (Gangrel toolbox)
3. Peter (Malkavian dem sb) 1 vp
4. Rasmus (Aus-weenie wall)
5. Jonas H (Street Cred-rush) 3 vp, 1 gw

Table 2:
1. Robert (Guhuri Nana rush)
2. Jens (Malkavian Alastor vote)
3. Henrik (Baali Malefecia Malefecia sb) 4 vp, 1 gw
4. Caroline (Toreador AAA gun-wall)
5. Randy (Setites Kementiri + Sarrasine Velvet Tounge vote) 1 vp

Table 3:
1. Peter (!Nosferatu Beast rush)
2. Kim (Ravnos ???) 1 vp
3. Kalle (Gangrel toolbox)
4. Rasmus (Malkavian ´94 sb) 3 vp, 1 gw
5. Ober (Anarch dom ???) 1 vp

Table 4:
1. Caroline (!Salubri with Rabbat ???)
2. Robert (Setites Aabbt Kindred vote) 3 vp, 1 gw
3. David (Malkavian dem sb) 1 vp
4. Johan (Dom-weenie) 1 vp
5. Jonas (Black Hand aus toolbox)

Table 5:
1. Henrik (Tzimisce ani-aus toolbox) 1 vp
2. Jonas S (Malkavian Lutz+Unmada vote)
3. Jonas H (Street Cred-rush) 3 vp, 1 gw
4. Jens (Dom-weenie)

League standings:
Jonas H 78 rtp
Jens 70 rtp
David 60 rtp
Randy 44 rtp
Martin 40 rtp
Ober 36 rtp
Henrik 34 rtp
Rasmus 30 rtp
Erik M 28 rtp
Robert 20 rtp
Kim 16 rtp
Peter, Tomas 8 rtp
Jan Erik 6 rtp
Caroline, Ivan, Johan, Kalle, Rudolf 4 rtp
(1 gw = 8 ratingpoints, 1 vp = 4 ratingpoints. Note: Players can play more than one game each round if their participation are needed to complete a table where at least one player has not yet played a league game this round, but only the best result each round counts for rating. If more players than 5 want to play such a table, lowest vp-count this round has priority. No league game starts after 20.00.)

The next round of the league is played at Dragon´s Lair, Kungsholmstorg 8 next Wednesday about 1800-ish. Be there!

söndag 12 oktober 2014

Ashur´s EC experience 2014 part 1: LCQ


Hi. It´s this time of the year again, when the EC is over and my mailbox is flooding with requests about me writing about my experiences. Here you go.

Let´s start with the LCQ, a tournament that didn´t matter much to me because I was triple qualified already (two tournament victories + qualified at the national qualifier in Gothenburg).But it´s one of the largest, if not the largest, tournaments during the year, so it would be fun to do good.

I chose to play a fun deck that I´m comfortable with, a variant of Rudolf Garski´s (or is it Johannes Walch´s?) bigcap vote-TWD “Obey the Tremere” with Gabrielle di Righetti & co. The deck is not very aggressive, but do “big actions” and is hard to stop if it get´s rolling. I won a tournament in Stockholm with a variant in August – I think I only took out Jake Washington, Ponticulus and Scourge of Enochians (Stockholm meta game choices).
 





















“Tutte in Germany”
Crypt (12 cards)
2x  Dr. John Dee            9  chi ANI AUS DOM THA      Tremere:4
3x  Gabrielle di Righetti  10  obf pot ANI AUS DOM THA  Tremere:5
1x  Gerald Windham          9  AUS DOM FOR THA          Tremere:5
2x  Malgorzata              9  pre AUS DOM THA VIC      !Tremere:4
2x  Mistress Fanchon       11  AUS CEL DOM OBF THA VIC  Tremere:4
2x  Orlando Oriundus        9  obf AUS DOM THA          !Tremere:4

Library (77 cards)
Master (20)
2x Dreams of the Sphinx
1x Giant's Blood
2x Information Highway
1x Metro Underground
1x Monastery of Shadows
1x Pentex(TM) Subversion
6x Villein
6x Zillah's Valley

Event (1)
1x Uncoiling, The

Action (5)
4x Mind Rape
1x Heart of Nizchetus

Political Action (14)
1x Anarchist Uprising
1x Ancient Influence
1x Ancilla Empowerment
2x Banishment
3x Kine Resources Contested
5x Parity Shift
1x Political Stranglehold

Action Modifier (16)
3x Conditioning
3x Into Thin Air
9x Mirror Walk
1x Enkil Cog

Reaction (21)
4x Deflection
4x Eyes of Argus
7x Obedience
4x Second Tradition: Domain
2x Telepathic Misdirection

As I often do I will illustrate the games with pictures. The colours are red = aggressive, orange = semi-aggressive, yellow = not aggressive at all.


Table 1



















Difficulty for me: 3/5. Of course getting a mirror match up is a nightmarish start of the tournament, especially when the mirror deck is my predator and he refuse to talk about that vampires he is bringing out (I have no idea why he didn´t want to talk), but I still though I could have chance at this table as there was no rush combat and such stuff. But I want you to know the total number of votes at the table when it was as most: 22 (if I recall correctly)
My performance: 1/5. Pulling off Villein + Giant´s Blood on Mistress Fanchon was the only thing that made me survive for a while. Pentex on Fanchon and then contest on Dr John Dee = me dead.
The other players: I watched the whole game after I was ousted, and the table didn´t evolve is I thought it would. Bjoern´s Malkavians didn´t bleed for 6 every bleed, mainly just 3 or 4, so Petri could bloat just enough and pull off 3 Walk of Caine one turn and oust Guilio, who I think had a bad draw. I thought Paul had total control of the table, but I got really close in the end.
Lesson to learn: Don´t play popular crypts.

Petri: 1 vp
Bjoern: 2 vp
Paul: 2 vp


Table 2
 


















Difficulty for me: 3/5. The curse of the many votes continues to follow me – in this game there was something like 28 at it´s worst. But this time I had both Gerald Windham and Orlando Oriundus, so I had the upper hand for most of the game.
My performance: 2/5. When Norbert and Alesandar was gone I couldn´t ever create enough stealth to get past Gabriele´s wall (Bowl of Convergeance - who playtested that card?! J).
The other players: All played rather aggressive and the game was fun.
Lesson to learn: I must become better at reading the table. As Norbert noted afterwards, it might have been smart of me to let him oust Gabriele, and when I think more about it I should probably not have saved Gabriele from being ousted by Aleksandar early in the game. I´m always reluctant to give Tzimisce wallish decks vp´s, but Norbert would probably been able to oust Aleksandar and a final three with me, Norbert and a weak Lauri would have been preferable to the one I got.

Norbert: 1 vp
Gabriele: 0,5 vp
Lauri: 0,5 vp
Me: 1,5 vp


Table 3



















Difficulty for me: 4/5. When I didn´t think there could be more votes – this table had 39 votes on the table! Everybody was bloating like crazy and I lost count of the Parity Shifts. In every deal I found myself on the losing end.
My performance: 2/5. But I tried.
The other players: I´m not sure what the Kiasyd player was doing, I guess he had a bad draw. The table as a who felt a bit too heated and stressed.
Lesson to learn: Get better at making deals with other vote decks. It´s a bit easier in Swedish though, or with people who is great at English.

















Francios: 3,5 vp
Randal: 0,5 vp
(not entirely sure here)

In conclusion: Only 1,5 vp in total. I shouldn´t have played a vote deck this day. Although I manage to stay alive a long time each game except the first, I couldn´t win a single table. I would have been better off at all tables with some random aggressive stealth-bleeder, like the Titus Camille-deck I played in EC day 1.

Skilled Stockholm player and EC regular Caroline was in the final of this tournament, but she was ousted by the victor Ruben Feldman, who played Malkavian dem-weenie stealth-bleed.
 
Stay tuned for reports on EC day 1 and 2.